<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another day, another Zuma court appearance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/</link>
	<description>This blog deals with political and social issues in South Africa, mostly from the perspective of Constitutional Law. Written by Pierre de Vos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindelani maseko</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9078</link>
		<dc:creator>lindelani maseko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9078</guid>
		<description>A white farmer has been sentenced to only 12 years for killing a young black 15 year boy.

we really do have justice in this country</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A white farmer has been sentenced to only 12 years for killing a young black 15 year boy.</p>
<p>we really do have justice in this country</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9047</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9047</guid>
		<description>Thanks - I read it correctly though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks &#8211; I read it correctly though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sne</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9042</link>
		<dc:creator>Sne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 10:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9042</guid>
		<description>Thanks Mouse;

Corrections though;

ADD PARA 3 OF MY SUBMISSIONS:

Last sentence should read &quot;instructions&quot; and not &#039;intructions&#039;.

ADD PARA 4 OF MY SUBMISSIONS:

Sentence 3 should read &quot;then he can re-join it&quot; and not &#039;cannot re-join it&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Mouse;</p>
<p>Corrections though;</p>
<p>ADD PARA 3 OF MY SUBMISSIONS:</p>
<p>Last sentence should read &#8220;instructions&#8221; and not &#8216;intructions&#8217;.</p>
<p>ADD PARA 4 OF MY SUBMISSIONS:</p>
<p>Sentence 3 should read &#8220;then he can re-join it&#8221; and not &#8216;cannot re-join it&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9041</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9041</guid>
		<description>Sne - good post and I agree in every respect</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sne &#8211; good post and I agree in every respect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sne</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9038</link>
		<dc:creator>Sne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9038</guid>
		<description>Anonymouse // Dec 2, 2008 at 10:20 am

&quot;Hlophe has never been suspended - he has, in consultation with the Minister, decided to take long leave pending the outcome of the complaint to the JSC - almost like Motata and Jackie Selebi.&quot;
...........................................................................................

This is exactly what most Zuma supporters fail to understand! This was done not to indicate that Hlophe is guilty or is being denied of his right to be presumed innocent but he did it out of respect for the office in which he was serving, the judiciary or being a judicial officer!

The respect of the public office which an accused held prior to the allegations against him necessitates that the individual concerned leave the office to maintain respect for that office! It the the reason why Mbeki fired or dismissed Zuma when Zuma refused to leave office until his name is cleared! For him to cling on to power, i.e. being the Deputy-President of the RSA, would have done more injustice to our country in the eyes of the world than to Zuma.

Therefore, on a preponderance of probabilities Mbeki decided that the entire country&#039;s image cannot be tarnished merely because a single individual wants to remain in power until the allegations against him are proved. By then the country&#039;s image would have been tarnished and the investors would have brought the country to its knees because they cannot invest in a country in which the Deputy-President is a suspected curruptee or corruptor, depending on the role played by his financial advisor on his intructions and for his benefit!

This is also applied in the private sector where the share-holders cannot tolerate having as its CEO someone who is alleged to be corrupt! He has to step down until his name is cleared! If we were to think away the moral fibre of Zuma and be left with only the allegations of being corrupt against him, then we would say that he must step aside from the Presidential race until he clears his name and then he cannot re-join it! However, there will still be left his moral fitness or otherwise given the HIV/AIDS status of more than five million South Africans, seen in the lense of his revelations in his rape trial!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymouse // Dec 2, 2008 at 10:20 am</p>
<p>&#8220;Hlophe has never been suspended &#8211; he has, in consultation with the Minister, decided to take long leave pending the outcome of the complaint to the JSC &#8211; almost like Motata and Jackie Selebi.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>This is exactly what most Zuma supporters fail to understand! This was done not to indicate that Hlophe is guilty or is being denied of his right to be presumed innocent but he did it out of respect for the office in which he was serving, the judiciary or being a judicial officer!</p>
<p>The respect of the public office which an accused held prior to the allegations against him necessitates that the individual concerned leave the office to maintain respect for that office! It the the reason why Mbeki fired or dismissed Zuma when Zuma refused to leave office until his name is cleared! For him to cling on to power, i.e. being the Deputy-President of the RSA, would have done more injustice to our country in the eyes of the world than to Zuma.</p>
<p>Therefore, on a preponderance of probabilities Mbeki decided that the entire country&#8217;s image cannot be tarnished merely because a single individual wants to remain in power until the allegations against him are proved. By then the country&#8217;s image would have been tarnished and the investors would have brought the country to its knees because they cannot invest in a country in which the Deputy-President is a suspected curruptee or corruptor, depending on the role played by his financial advisor on his intructions and for his benefit!</p>
<p>This is also applied in the private sector where the share-holders cannot tolerate having as its CEO someone who is alleged to be corrupt! He has to step down until his name is cleared! If we were to think away the moral fibre of Zuma and be left with only the allegations of being corrupt against him, then we would say that he must step aside from the Presidential race until he clears his name and then he cannot re-join it! However, there will still be left his moral fitness or otherwise given the HIV/AIDS status of more than five million South Africans, seen in the lense of his revelations in his rape trial!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9036</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9036</guid>
		<description>Bongs - &quot;Mouse, how can Lindelani ‘review’ his own attitude? Got you there!!!&quot; ... Thanks for being sharp and quick enough to grasp that - I was actually attempting to trap you and a few others to engage with me on whether I have now changed my view on whether someone can &#039;review&#039; his own decision. (Lindelani would never understand that.)

I have however not changed my view. In fact, in a post of mine submitted at 1:56 pm (which is still awaiting moderation for some reason or the other), I expressed my  total agreement with shakira&#039;s post of Nov 30, 10:22 am and dontgetmestarted&#039;s post of Dec 1, 12:49 pm. 

In any case, on the lindelani issue, I agree with you, sne, The Big Slipper and Oscar immediately above. This guy is making himself and, therefore, in the eyes of non-lawers, also other young black lawyers (and the Wits law school where he reportedly qualified), look stupid. The following sentence displays his childish ignorance: &quot;You ask yourself why was judge president suspended with immediate effect upon the complain laid against him?&quot; Hlophe has never been suspended - he has, in consultation with the Minister, decided to take long leave pending the outcome of the complaint to the JSC - almost like Motata and Jackie Selebi. The one who was suspended with immediate effect is Vusi Pikoli.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bongs &#8211; &#8220;Mouse, how can Lindelani ‘review’ his own attitude? Got you there!!!&#8221; &#8230; Thanks for being sharp and quick enough to grasp that &#8211; I was actually attempting to trap you and a few others to engage with me on whether I have now changed my view on whether someone can &#8216;review&#8217; his own decision. (Lindelani would never understand that.)</p>
<p>I have however not changed my view. In fact, in a post of mine submitted at 1:56 pm (which is still awaiting moderation for some reason or the other), I expressed my  total agreement with shakira&#8217;s post of Nov 30, 10:22 am and dontgetmestarted&#8217;s post of Dec 1, 12:49 pm. </p>
<p>In any case, on the lindelani issue, I agree with you, sne, The Big Slipper and Oscar immediately above. This guy is making himself and, therefore, in the eyes of non-lawers, also other young black lawyers (and the Wits law school where he reportedly qualified), look stupid. The following sentence displays his childish ignorance: &#8220;You ask yourself why was judge president suspended with immediate effect upon the complain laid against him?&#8221; Hlophe has never been suspended &#8211; he has, in consultation with the Minister, decided to take long leave pending the outcome of the complaint to the JSC &#8211; almost like Motata and Jackie Selebi. The one who was suspended with immediate effect is Vusi Pikoli.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscar</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9030</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9030</guid>
		<description>&#039;I do not think that you can knock some sense into Lindelani.&#039; 

Judging by his latest offering, this would seem to be true. If lindelani is a lawyer, and is allowed to go unchecked after his rantings here, then we are in trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;I do not think that you can knock some sense into Lindelani.&#8217; </p>
<p>Judging by his latest offering, this would seem to be true. If lindelani is a lawyer, and is allowed to go unchecked after his rantings here, then we are in trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Big Slipper</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9028</link>
		<dc:creator>The Big Slipper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9028</guid>
		<description>I thought Linelani was a legal secretary? Is that the same thing as a lawyer these days? Or is my information incorrect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Linelani was a legal secretary? Is that the same thing as a lawyer these days? Or is my information incorrect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindelani maseko</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9022</link>
		<dc:creator>lindelani maseko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9022</guid>
		<description>Those who want to complain to Investec must go ahead and do so!

I will never change my beliefs for no one, I will never compromise my manbeing for no one.

We can never sit aside and look while people are going around calling our president a rapist.

We (and especially me) we never ever tolerate the racist white judges and lawyers who continue to perpetuate their racism within the profession and that is the belief i will die for

If people think I need to be reported to the law society for what i believe in they must go ahead and do so - for what? that i hate white people? i wonder how many white lawyers and judges our there who are practising and sit in our court whereas they continue to be racists.

They won&#039;t be struck from the roll. We judge Lewis continuing to sit in court despite the fact that the complain has been laid (by the Black LawyersAssociation) against her

You ask yourself why was judge president suspended with immediate effect upon the complain laid against him?

These questions remain unanswered! When I raise these concerns I should be struck from the roll, how &quot;wonderful&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who want to complain to Investec must go ahead and do so!</p>
<p>I will never change my beliefs for no one, I will never compromise my manbeing for no one.</p>
<p>We can never sit aside and look while people are going around calling our president a rapist.</p>
<p>We (and especially me) we never ever tolerate the racist white judges and lawyers who continue to perpetuate their racism within the profession and that is the belief i will die for</p>
<p>If people think I need to be reported to the law society for what i believe in they must go ahead and do so &#8211; for what? that i hate white people? i wonder how many white lawyers and judges our there who are practising and sit in our court whereas they continue to be racists.</p>
<p>They won&#8217;t be struck from the roll. We judge Lewis continuing to sit in court despite the fact that the complain has been laid (by the Black LawyersAssociation) against her</p>
<p>You ask yourself why was judge president suspended with immediate effect upon the complain laid against him?</p>
<p>These questions remain unanswered! When I raise these concerns I should be struck from the roll, how &#8220;wonderful&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sne</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/another-day-another-zuma-court-appearance/#comment-9021</link>
		<dc:creator>Sne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=738#comment-9021</guid>
		<description>Mouse and Bongs,

I do not think that you can knock some sense into Lindelani. I am not exactly sure what is wrong with the guy but he has a certain way of looking at things to see exactly what he wants to see! I think the guy needs serious professional help! A brief history into his life would reveal why he has this resentment which he needs to let go of as soon as it is reasonably practicable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mouse and Bongs,</p>
<p>I do not think that you can knock some sense into Lindelani. I am not exactly sure what is wrong with the guy but he has a certain way of looking at things to see exactly what he wants to see! I think the guy needs serious professional help! A brief history into his life would reveal why he has this resentment which he needs to let go of as soon as it is reasonably practicable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

