Quote of the week

The judgments are replete with the findings of dishonesty and mala fides against Major General Ntlemeza. These were judicial pronouncements. They therefore constitute direct evidence that Major General Ntlemeza lacks the requisite honesty, integrity and conscientiousness to occupy the position of any public office, not to mention an office as more important as that of the National Head of the DPCI, where independence, honesty and integrity are paramount to qualities. Currently no appeal lies against the findings of dishonesty and impropriety made by the Court in the judgments. Accordingly, such serious findings of fact in relation to Major General Ntlemeza, which go directly to Major General Ntlemeza’s trustworthiness, his honesty and integrity, are definitive. Until such findings are appealed against successfully they shall remain as a lapidary against Lieutenant General Ntlemeza.

Mabuse J
Helen Suzman Foundation and Another v Minister of Police and Others
12 May 2015

DA v Speaker – judgment on removal and arrest of MPs:

Here is the Western Cape High Court judgment declaring invalid section 11 of the Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act (dealing with the removal and arrest of MPs in Parliament). Click here: DA v Speaker

SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest