<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double standard or respect for the Rule of Law?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/</link>
	<description>This blog deals with political and social issues in South Africa, mostly from the perspective of Constitutional Law. Written by Pierre de Vos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 23:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The story so far&#8230; &#124; Grubstreet</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-14168</link>
		<dc:creator>The story so far&#8230; &#124; Grubstreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 12:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-14168</guid>
		<description>[...]  “Double Standard or respect for the rule of law?” (Constitutionally Speaking blog) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  “Double Standard or respect for the rule of law?” (Constitutionally Speaking blog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mpshe and Zuma: key links &#124; Grubstreet</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-14140</link>
		<dc:creator>Mpshe and Zuma: key links &#124; Grubstreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-14140</guid>
		<description>[...] “Double Standard or respect for the rule of law?” (Constitutionally Speaking blog)  http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “Double Standard or respect for the rule of law?” (Constitutionally Speaking blog)  <a href="http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974" rel="nofollow">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ajax</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-14010</link>
		<dc:creator>Ajax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 06:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-14010</guid>
		<description>Well I am not surprise by a negative bandwagon reaction from the White media, analysts and commentators who seem so hellbent on destroying the man not because he is evil but simply because of this deep-seated hatred that white people have of black people. When Zuma was making allegations that there his case was political motivated there was screams from almost all corners saying he must provide the evidence. The question is how will Zuma have provided such evidence when he is not in the position to access it? Luckily some messiah within the stated institution entrusted will the custody of this information came to the rescue and provided such information.

Having been &quot;caught with their pants down&quot; when the evidence of meddling was provided the same seekers of evidence all off a sudden changed tune by all of a suddenly turning their attention away from the evidence they so sought from the man to how the evidence was acquired..... Which tells you one thing; there is lots of double standards in the white controlled media. How was Zuma suppose to provide evidence of political conspirary? Do people invite you in their little private forums/meetings when they conspire to do evil against you? No. How was Zuma suppose to have access to that information then without someone spying on them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I am not surprise by a negative bandwagon reaction from the White media, analysts and commentators who seem so hellbent on destroying the man not because he is evil but simply because of this deep-seated hatred that white people have of black people. When Zuma was making allegations that there his case was political motivated there was screams from almost all corners saying he must provide the evidence. The question is how will Zuma have provided such evidence when he is not in the position to access it? Luckily some messiah within the stated institution entrusted will the custody of this information came to the rescue and provided such information.</p>
<p>Having been &#8220;caught with their pants down&#8221; when the evidence of meddling was provided the same seekers of evidence all off a sudden changed tune by all of a suddenly turning their attention away from the evidence they so sought from the man to how the evidence was acquired&#8230;.. Which tells you one thing; there is lots of double standards in the white controlled media. How was Zuma suppose to provide evidence of political conspirary? Do people invite you in their little private forums/meetings when they conspire to do evil against you? No. How was Zuma suppose to have access to that information then without someone spying on them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was Mpshe&#8217;s Zuma decision plagiarised? The Hong Kong judge thinks so! &#124; Grubstreet</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-13955</link>
		<dc:creator>Was Mpshe&#8217;s Zuma decision plagiarised? The Hong Kong judge thinks so! &#124; Grubstreet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 05:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-13955</guid>
		<description>[...] Double standard or respect for the Rule of Law?      Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Double standard or respect for the Rule of Law?      Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozoneblue</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-13809</link>
		<dc:creator>ozoneblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-13809</guid>
		<description>ok I have found the useless search button now - lets see nothing comes up when I type the word &quot;RICO&quot; - ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok I have found the useless search button now &#8211; lets see nothing comes up when I type the word &#8220;RICO&#8221; &#8211; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mcdaniel</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-13757</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mcdaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-13757</guid>
		<description>lol pierre i can see your frustration.

Its like a 5 yr old arguing with someone from NASA that you cant send rockets into space no way no how its impossible, is the best way i can describe the frustration you seem to have with ozonehole.

But i must admit i do find it rather amuzing he cant even find it on google.

Ozone type in RICO ACT, not Rico Coffee if you really having problems with this to spell it out for you R.I.C.O
stands for Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organisation 

and please look up
 Interception &amp; Monitoring Act 

man thanks guys this made me laugh today</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol pierre i can see your frustration.</p>
<p>Its like a 5 yr old arguing with someone from NASA that you cant send rockets into space no way no how its impossible, is the best way i can describe the frustration you seem to have with ozonehole.</p>
<p>But i must admit i do find it rather amuzing he cant even find it on google.</p>
<p>Ozone type in RICO ACT, not Rico Coffee if you really having problems with this to spell it out for you R.I.C.O<br />
stands for Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organisation </p>
<p>and please look up<br />
 Interception &amp; Monitoring Act </p>
<p>man thanks guys this made me laugh today</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre De Vos</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-13756</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre De Vos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-13756</guid>
		<description>Ozoneblue, there is a search facility above the picture of the Constitutional Court on the top right hand of the Blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ozoneblue, there is a search facility above the picture of the Constitutional Court on the top right hand of the Blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozoneblue</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-13754</link>
		<dc:creator>ozoneblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-13754</guid>
		<description>Pierre De Vos  @ 7:18 am

So I must assume you were bullshitting then ?   

Since your blog lacks a search button, after plenty of google searches I find no information whatsoever on how the RICO Act is applicable in law to South Africa - never mind how it relates to state owned classified information.

Please clarify - kindly have patience with me and see me as another one of your dumb students.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pierre De Vos  @ 7:18 am</p>
<p>So I must assume you were bullshitting then ?   </p>
<p>Since your blog lacks a search button, after plenty of google searches I find no information whatsoever on how the RICO Act is applicable in law to South Africa &#8211; never mind how it relates to state owned classified information.</p>
<p>Please clarify &#8211; kindly have patience with me and see me as another one of your dumb students.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre De Vos</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-13753</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre De Vos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-13753</guid>
		<description>Ozoneblue, if a student demanded that I repeat a lecture because she missed it because she was playing Klawerjas in the student Union or drinking beer in The Barn, I will not oblige. I can&#039;t take responsibility for other people&#039;s laziness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ozoneblue, if a student demanded that I repeat a lecture because she missed it because she was playing Klawerjas in the student Union or drinking beer in The Barn, I will not oblige. I can&#8217;t take responsibility for other people&#8217;s laziness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ozoneblue</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/double-standard-or-respect-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-13751</link>
		<dc:creator>ozoneblue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=974#comment-13751</guid>
		<description>Pierre De Vos  @ 10:37 pm 

I see. 

Don&#039;t bother to provide a link then. I would love to read any of your students papers though : under the references section -  &quot;STFW&quot; or &quot;F..off I gave references last year&quot;  or &quot;the prof. said so&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pierre De Vos  @ 10:37 pm </p>
<p>I see. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t bother to provide a link then. I would love to read any of your students papers though : under the references section &#8211;  &#8220;STFW&#8221; or &#8220;F..off I gave references last year&#8221;  or &#8220;the prof. said so&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

