<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to defend the indefensible</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/</link>
	<description>This blog deals with political and social issues in South Africa, mostly from the perspective of Constitutional Law. Written by Pierre de Vos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:55:26 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anton kleinschmidt</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18645</link>
		<dc:creator>anton kleinschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18645</guid>
		<description>@ Black Star Liner

Please explain why a black member of the judiciary who is doing very well and is highly regarded by his colleagues, black and white, is also a victim of &quot;white normative institutional racism&quot;.  Is this because it suits you or are there valid reasons that society should be aware of.

You are starting to sound plaintive rather than convinced of your rectitude.

I take comfort from the fact that accusations of racism have  finite durability and that eventually they will cease to have any impact in informed circles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Black Star Liner</p>
<p>Please explain why a black member of the judiciary who is doing very well and is highly regarded by his colleagues, black and white, is also a victim of &#8220;white normative institutional racism&#8221;.  Is this because it suits you or are there valid reasons that society should be aware of.</p>
<p>You are starting to sound plaintive rather than convinced of your rectitude.</p>
<p>I take comfort from the fact that accusations of racism have  finite durability and that eventually they will cease to have any impact in informed circles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black Star Liner</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18638</link>
		<dc:creator>Black Star Liner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18638</guid>
		<description>@ anton kleinschimdt:

&quot;Are they also victims of “white normative institutional racism?”

Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ anton kleinschimdt:</p>
<p>&#8220;Are they also victims of “white normative institutional racism?”</p>
<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anton kleinschmidt</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18604</link>
		<dc:creator>anton kleinschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18604</guid>
		<description>@ Black Star Liner...you say....&quot;I understand (experiencially and deductively) that John Hlophe JP is a victim of white normative institutional racism.&quot;

There are plenty of black legal practioners who are doing very well within the legal fraternity and who are highly respected by their colleagues, both black and white. Are they also victims of &quot;white normative institutional racism?&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Black Star Liner&#8230;you say&#8230;.&#8221;I understand (experiencially and deductively) that John Hlophe JP is a victim of white normative institutional racism.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are plenty of black legal practioners who are doing very well within the legal fraternity and who are highly respected by their colleagues, both black and white. Are they also victims of &#8220;white normative institutional racism?&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18593</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 19:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18593</guid>
		<description>Maggs, I have told you a thousand times that I reject, with contempt, the idea you need any particular experience to be a judge.
 
A good heart, and a sense of UBUNTU is what counts.

Respek!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggs, I have told you a thousand times that I reject, with contempt, the idea you need any particular experience to be a judge.</p>
<p>A good heart, and a sense of UBUNTU is what counts.</p>
<p>Respek!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggs Naidu</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18580</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggs Naidu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18580</guid>
		<description>Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder says:
September 14, 2009 at 17:53 pm

LOL @ your p.s.

Is there anything definitive to give rise to the concerns about our Black judges?

If indeed there are valid reasons why people are concerned, is our system not sufficiently geared to remedy that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder says:<br />
September 14, 2009 at 17:53 pm</p>
<p>LOL @ your p.s.</p>
<p>Is there anything definitive to give rise to the concerns about our Black judges?</p>
<p>If indeed there are valid reasons why people are concerned, is our system not sufficiently geared to remedy that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18570</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18570</guid>
		<description>Maggs, there probably is some research, but I would not bother reading it.  You will find it is statistically dubious crap written by racist liberals.

Anyway, such research, even if it exists, would not impress me.

We all understand that there are just some jobs where years of experience is of little or no value.  In that regard, being a judge is a bit like riding a bicycle.  Do you know what I mean?

P.S. I always answer questions.  So, yes, Maggs there is indeed a link between pot and flying.  But only quite a tenuous one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggs, there probably is some research, but I would not bother reading it.  You will find it is statistically dubious crap written by racist liberals.</p>
<p>Anyway, such research, even if it exists, would not impress me.</p>
<p>We all understand that there are just some jobs where years of experience is of little or no value.  In that regard, being a judge is a bit like riding a bicycle.  Do you know what I mean?</p>
<p>P.S. I always answer questions.  So, yes, Maggs there is indeed a link between pot and flying.  But only quite a tenuous one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggs Naidu</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18569</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggs Naidu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18569</guid>
		<description>Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder says:
September 14, 2009 at 17:30 pm

You seem sufficiently well informed.

Is there any research on the extent of the awful judgments by the Black judges appointed since 1994 or do we have to rely on the what we are told by those who know best?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder says:<br />
September 14, 2009 at 17:30 pm</p>
<p>You seem sufficiently well informed.</p>
<p>Is there any research on the extent of the awful judgments by the Black judges appointed since 1994 or do we have to rely on the what we are told by those who know best?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggs Naidu</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18568</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggs Naidu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18568</guid>
		<description>oops!

make that link</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops!</p>
<p>make that link</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggs Naidu</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18567</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggs Naidu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18567</guid>
		<description>Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder says:
September 14, 2009 at 17:26 pm

Is there a like between pot and flying?

You seem to have an affinity for both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder says:<br />
September 14, 2009 at 17:26 pm</p>
<p>Is there a like between pot and flying?</p>
<p>You seem to have an affinity for both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/how-to-defend-the-indefensible/#comment-18566</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikhail Dworkin Fassbinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=1468#comment-18566</guid>
		<description>Maggs is right.

She obviously knows a lot about the training programs of the Law Society and the Bar.

Like Maggs, I have not heard of any initiative they have to train young lawyers.

Nothing.

Nada.

Ziltch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggs is right.</p>
<p>She obviously knows a lot about the training programs of the Law Society and the Bar.</p>
<p>Like Maggs, I have not heard of any initiative they have to train young lawyers.</p>
<p>Nothing.</p>
<p>Nada.</p>
<p>Ziltch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
