The Chief Justice of South Africa, the Hon. Mr Justice Sandile Ngcobo, will deliver the first Claude Leon public lecture on the topic:
This blog deals with political and social issues in South Africa, mostly from the perspective of Constitutional Law. Written by Pierre de Vos
“The importance of public confidence in the judiciary in South Africa”
Please join us afterwards for drinks and snacks
Quote of the week
May 20, 2012 | 11:21 amHow sweet it would be to live among us, if the exterior appearance was always an image of the heart’s tendencies; if decency was a virtue; if our maxims served us as rules; if true philosophy was inseparable from the title of philosopher! But so many qualities too rarely go together, and virtue hardly ever walks in so much pomp. Richness in dress can announce a man with money and elegance a man with taste. The healthy, robust man is recognized by other signs. It is under the rustic clothing of a labourer and not under the gilded frame of a courtesan that one will find physical strength and energy. Finery is no less a stranger to virtue, which is the power and vigour of the soul. The good man is an athlete who delights in fighting naked. He despises all those vile ornaments which hamper the use of his strength, the majority of which were invented only to conceal some deformity. Before art fashioned our manners and taught our passions to speak an affected language, our habits were rustic but natural, and differences in behaviour announced at first glance differences in character. Human nature was not fundamentally better, but men found their security in the ease with which they could see through each other, and this advantage, whose value we no longer feel, spared them many vices. – Jean-Jacques Rousseau in Discourse on the Sciences and the Arts
-
Archive for Quote of the week »
New from Seminar Room
- Zuma affidavit in the willygate case
- FUL’s founding affidavit on Mdluli case
- Pierre de Vos: Taking risks, taking responsibility: on whiteness and full citizenship under the South African Constitution
- Pierre de Vos: memo on SA Police Service Amendment Bill
- Justice Zac Yacoob on the “Dynamic Constitution”
- Oslo Declaration on HIV criminalisation
-
Archive for New from Seminar Room »
New from Updates
- Call for submissions to arms deal inquiry
- Podcast of DCJ Moseneke lecture at Georgetown University
- Internships at Human Rights Commission
- Shortlisted names for appointment to the Constitutional Court
- Chief Justice statement on death of Cabinet Minister
- ANC rejects Holomisa’s statement on gays and lesbians
-
Archive for New from Updates »
Former President Thabo Mbeki will address the African Student Leaders’ Summit at the University of Cape Town on Monday September the 6th at 17h00 at the Jammie Hall.
I hear the tickets to the Mbeki event are finished.
I also have had the priviledge of attending a lecture by Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo, at UKZN. He spoke of customary law in South Africa. It was very informative.
@Khosi: I hear the tickets to the Mbeki event are finished.
I have got a complimentary ticket, wanna have it?
@ewald,
What are you smoking? How can you give complimentary tickets to an events whose ticket is free anyway?
The reason they issue tickets, instead of openly letting everyone in, is because they are trying to avoid stampedes. Mbeki events are always packed and his speeches are becoming a religious experience, a scripture. So tickets are a control measure.
Mbeki is an African star whose light will not dim, despite of efforts by people like the owner of this blog.
So, NO! Keep your fake ticket.
SA media hardly the ideal poster boy for press freedom
Intersting comments about this blog:
You know something is wrong when Jackson Mthembu comes across as the reasonable voice in any debate.
The media is its own worst enemy in this whole brouhaha regarding potential media freedom infringements in the Protection of Information Bill and the mooted Media Appeals Tribunal. It should not ever be the most difficult thing to do to defend media freedom in a country with as robust a Constitution and free press as ours. But for all its posturing and hysteria, the media is doing a very crappy job of arguing its case. I have to say this applies more to the print media than online as the level of analysis and argument over the issue (see Prof Pierre de Vos’s blog) is superior on the virtual medium. With print media having a wider reach in our largely offline country, the cause for press freedom still needs the broadsheets and tabloids to champion.
Now why do I say that Mthembu is coming across as the rational side of this argument? Pick up any newspaper and read their reporting on the issue. It’s all doomsday hysteria about the ANC looking to transport every journo in the country into Robben Island blindfolded and in shackles. Cheap, alarmist and misinformative. The thing is it is very easy for the ANC, especially in a country with a media as prone to embarrassing lapses in quality as ours, to highlight the positive intent behind the bill and the media tribunal. Just this week a major daily extension of a large Sunday broadsheet had to run an apology after the Press Ombudsman found that a front-page headline article about an official in the Office of the President was no more than conjecture and hearsay.
The truth is there is a very good argument to be made for toughening the ethical requirements for journalists and allowing for a more robust avenue for recourse for those wronged by shoddy reporting work. The apology forced by the Ombudsman cannot for example erase the perception that has now been created against Presidency director-general Lakela Kaunda. A vague page-two apology can never undo a bold front-page splash. But that is as far as recourse goes in this country. An undesirable situation and one which the ANC has seized upon brilliantly to further its surely undeniable aim of muzzling a critical press. It is very hard to argue against the tribunal when one views the current laissez-faire approach to fact-checking and ethics in (mostly) print media. In fact only the (very important) principle that the government should never be allowed to dictate terms to the press is about the only one that has been raised against the tribunal.
The bill is a rare example of guile and cunning on the part of the ANC. I say rare because the ANC in government has had all the subtlety of a bunch of pigs jostling for position in an ever-shrinking trough. The concerns raised against how it could be used to curtail media freedom are legitimate, yet it is only very recently, and in the online realm that the bill has been dissected logically and plainly enough for the layman to understand just what is at play. The ANC has made great noises about all the remedies (wonderfully repudiated by Prof De Vos and Mike Trapido this week) the bill avails and the print media hasn’t taken the hint and gone out to educate people about the bill in a logical objective manner before arguing its case. Instead all you get is hype about the downside of the bill, which to a society that is already sceptical of the media, comes across as exactly what it is, panicked paranoid ramblings from people who know they haven’t lived up to the standards they profess to uphold. The same media that speaks down to South Africans is now hoping to rally them to their cause, for their sake.
This is a media that has in recent years, predicted the downfall of Jacob Zuma, painted him as a rapist despite his acquittal in a court of law, predicted the imminent end of ANC domination of the polls, the rise of Cope as a viable opposition movement, raised fears of a non-existent plague of xenophobia and has for the past year told us that Malema is on his way out very soon, and still claims to be the voice of the people. Make no mistake media freedoms must be protected, government must never be allowed to interfere in how the media works, especially not a government that is doing such a rubbish job of delivering on its promises. But good God, we are in desperate need of a media sector more deserving of such protection.
@ Khosi
Do they allow questions at these events? I would love to attend just to hear him answer questions about his legacy but not a religious one way sermon.
What a joke!!
The ex officio chairperson of the JSC talking about the importance of public confidence in the judiciary!
It’s actually hillarious.
It’s actually, correctly paraphrased, about the chief of the serial bunglers at the JSC talking about why it is important that the public should not get wind of and/or understand how that very body is meeting for meeting undermining the judiciary: By adherring to the higher party political “law” of “transformation” and some NDR – which they regard as more sacrosanct than the constitution. Their constitution behind the constitution – but about which the public and outside world should not know.
The JSC, singlehandedly is THE underminer of public confidence in the judiciary.
I should not attend. Really. I’ll piss myself laughing.
Is Khosi serious? Or just another brainwashed pathetic fool who can’t think for himself. Mbeki…a stampede. The tickets are “finished”. P-fukcen-lease. Wake me up when this vampire-esque kindergarden is over. He is joking right?
Mbeki’s speeches have become a religious experience? I’m sure…in hell that is. The religion of hell.
@Herman Lategan,
1.) Ask the people at Wits what happened earlier this year when Mbeki delivered a speech at that university.
2.) Call UCT and ask them if there are seats still available for Mbeki’s speech next Monday.
Please do not take my word for it. After all intellectuals of immense quality such as yourself do not listen much to ‘brainwashed pathetic fools’.
@Gwebecimele,
Yes, the Wits one did have a session like that. I am not sure of the other ones but the media reports seem to agree, as well.
Lets hope Judges will be vocal on issues such as these.
http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Wa-Afrika-charges-dropped-20100907