<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On a two-thirds majority and changing the Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/</link>
	<description>This blog deals with political and social issues in South Africa, mostly from the perspective of Constitutional Law. Written by Pierre de Vos</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:56:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nkululeko</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-14783</link>
		<dc:creator>nkululeko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 08:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-14783</guid>
		<description>This has been interesting, a month later... Zille did, if you attended smaller gatherings and not simply get snippets from the media, talk about service delivery. That is why the DA won the Western Cape. The people there herad about, and saw, how effective the DA had been in improving service delivery in CPT. Service delivery was, therefore, a central element to the campaign - if only you&#039;d wisened up to that notion earlier Prof.

I am quite irritated that there are probably rape victims who voted for Zuma. Also that a few of my gay friends probably voted for the ANC after Zuma&#039;s utterings. I personally did not waste my vote on a man who will use the collective voice to destroy Constitutional values.

I believe that issues that are abstract are real to those who consider them. The real issues of the poor are foreign to the super-wealthy. There should be some sort of expressionof the issues, whatever they may be, in a way that the rich and poor both realise they have the same concern. The DA had, among its principal concerns, Health, Education and Safety. Education and Safety affect us all in various shapes and forms. Health is a primary concern of those without medical aids and who have to currently deal with striking doctors. The &quot;open opprtunity society&quot; promotes a sociaty where all South Africans are equal from the starting blocks, as it were. It is, obviously, in keeping with the DA&#039;s liberal policies. I understand it to suggest that the playing fields must be levelled as soon as possible and that we cannot simply use AA in a way that does not advance the society. It also promotes that there be more focus on people&#039;s contributions than to race, in many a context.

The matter of Zuma is particularly sad. He was let off the hook as a political ploy and the people have been, largely, silent. I may be wrong, the people have endorsed that with their vote. If Zuma is to be a reflection of South AFricans then I&#039;d much rather go to the USA and have Obama be my representative to the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been interesting, a month later&#8230; Zille did, if you attended smaller gatherings and not simply get snippets from the media, talk about service delivery. That is why the DA won the Western Cape. The people there herad about, and saw, how effective the DA had been in improving service delivery in CPT. Service delivery was, therefore, a central element to the campaign &#8211; if only you&#8217;d wisened up to that notion earlier Prof.</p>
<p>I am quite irritated that there are probably rape victims who voted for Zuma. Also that a few of my gay friends probably voted for the ANC after Zuma&#8217;s utterings. I personally did not waste my vote on a man who will use the collective voice to destroy Constitutional values.</p>
<p>I believe that issues that are abstract are real to those who consider them. The real issues of the poor are foreign to the super-wealthy. There should be some sort of expressionof the issues, whatever they may be, in a way that the rich and poor both realise they have the same concern. The DA had, among its principal concerns, Health, Education and Safety. Education and Safety affect us all in various shapes and forms. Health is a primary concern of those without medical aids and who have to currently deal with striking doctors. The &#8220;open opprtunity society&#8221; promotes a sociaty where all South Africans are equal from the starting blocks, as it were. It is, obviously, in keeping with the DA&#8217;s liberal policies. I understand it to suggest that the playing fields must be levelled as soon as possible and that we cannot simply use AA in a way that does not advance the society. It also promotes that there be more focus on people&#8217;s contributions than to race, in many a context.</p>
<p>The matter of Zuma is particularly sad. He was let off the hook as a political ploy and the people have been, largely, silent. I may be wrong, the people have endorsed that with their vote. If Zuma is to be a reflection of South AFricans then I&#8217;d much rather go to the USA and have Obama be my representative to the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold Ferwood</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-13864</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold Ferwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-13864</guid>
		<description>Now that much of the smaller parties have been put on their places, The ANC can consider serious constitutional changes and not these mickey mouse crap dealing with municipalities ... can&#039;t wait for the dipping into Chapter 2!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that much of the smaller parties have been put on their places, The ANC can consider serious constitutional changes and not these mickey mouse crap dealing with municipalities &#8230; can&#8217;t wait for the dipping into Chapter 2!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garg Unzola</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-13848</link>
		<dc:creator>Garg Unzola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-13848</guid>
		<description>I read a survey which found that more than half of the ANC supporters believe that Jake &#039;the Take&#039; Zuma is guilty. Even a conviction of Zuma for his crimes would not have dented their confidence in the ANC. The only thing that would dent their confidence in the ANC is if the ANC chose a white leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read a survey which found that more than half of the ANC supporters believe that Jake &#8216;the Take&#8217; Zuma is guilty. Even a conviction of Zuma for his crimes would not have dented their confidence in the ANC. The only thing that would dent their confidence in the ANC is if the ANC chose a white leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Osborne</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-13845</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 07:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-13845</guid>
		<description>Vuyo, I really don’t believe the withdrawal of the Zuma charges made much difference in the elections.  A large mass of South Africans would cast their ballot for the ANC irrespective of whether Zuma, Mbeki, Lekota or Ramaphosa were its Presidential candidate.  

Many (but not all), of this group assume the charges against Zuma were trumped up anyway .  For them, even a conviction would hardy have dimmed their enthusiasm.
As for the balance of voters (much less than 50%, I think), those predisposed against Zuma were not going to start supporting him because the charges have been dropped.  Most of the chattering classes (I think this includes all of us on this blog, almost by definition), are convinced, rightly or wrongly, that  Zuma is corrupt.  If anything, what is seen as the cynical political manipulation of the NPA may make them even less inclined to support him and his party.

I concede there will be a sub-class of chatterers may be less hesitant to vote ANC after the dropping of the charges --  because they thought that having the President  on trial would be destabilising.   But I think this grouping would be too small to make much of a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vuyo, I really don’t believe the withdrawal of the Zuma charges made much difference in the elections.  A large mass of South Africans would cast their ballot for the ANC irrespective of whether Zuma, Mbeki, Lekota or Ramaphosa were its Presidential candidate.  </p>
<p>Many (but not all), of this group assume the charges against Zuma were trumped up anyway .  For them, even a conviction would hardy have dimmed their enthusiasm.<br />
As for the balance of voters (much less than 50%, I think), those predisposed against Zuma were not going to start supporting him because the charges have been dropped.  Most of the chattering classes (I think this includes all of us on this blog, almost by definition), are convinced, rightly or wrongly, that  Zuma is corrupt.  If anything, what is seen as the cynical political manipulation of the NPA may make them even less inclined to support him and his party.</p>
<p>I concede there will be a sub-class of chatterers may be less hesitant to vote ANC after the dropping of the charges &#8212;  because they thought that having the President  on trial would be destabilising.   But I think this grouping would be too small to make much of a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clara</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-13840</link>
		<dc:creator>Clara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-13840</guid>
		<description>Vuyo//Apr 24 2009 at 10.21 am

Vuyo, what you said in your comment made for upsetting reading. If it&#039;s true that the &#039;masses&#039; don&#039;t care about ethics, then we will inevitably become a lawless society. I&#039;m having a really dark moment here.

And what about that little matter of the illegal/classified/declassified tapes? Would one be correct in assuming that, having been conveniently swept under some carpet, it will never see the light of day again? Are we off to a fresh start, so to speak, now that the elections are over, with everything forgiven and forgotten? Can we be expected, as usual, to again become spectators for the next five years?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vuyo//Apr 24 2009 at 10.21 am</p>
<p>Vuyo, what you said in your comment made for upsetting reading. If it&#8217;s true that the &#8216;masses&#8217; don&#8217;t care about ethics, then we will inevitably become a lawless society. I&#8217;m having a really dark moment here.</p>
<p>And what about that little matter of the illegal/classified/declassified tapes? Would one be correct in assuming that, having been conveniently swept under some carpet, it will never see the light of day again? Are we off to a fresh start, so to speak, now that the elections are over, with everything forgiven and forgotten? Can we be expected, as usual, to again become spectators for the next five years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sne</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-13835</link>
		<dc:creator>Sne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-13835</guid>
		<description>khosi // Apr 24, 2009 at 2:24 pm
.........................................................

I must admit though that I also admire the man. I have been consistently quoting him when these ardent ANC supporters ask me who I have voted for. When asked by the journalists who he voted for, Mbeki said that he cannot reveil such information as he, just like everyone else, is supposed to vote with his conscience and not fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>khosi // Apr 24, 2009 at 2:24 pm<br />
&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I must admit though that I also admire the man. I have been consistently quoting him when these ardent ANC supporters ask me who I have voted for. When asked by the journalists who he voted for, Mbeki said that he cannot reveil such information as he, just like everyone else, is supposed to vote with his conscience and not fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris McDaniel</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-13834</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris McDaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-13834</guid>
		<description>Michael Osborne  // Apr 24, 2009 at 2:41 pm  

fair enough but before we end up hi jacking this thread. yes i agree 300 000 ground troops were needed thats why the bush administration tried to get countries involved it wasnt just a war between the US and terrorism its a global problem and im afraid the world powers didnt come to the party. so part of the blame for the lack of success is really the other countries lack of support  and not helping out and they based it on personnalities im afriad. 

but back to south africa I strongly believe politics is all about who has access to a magical vault that has an endless supply of cash.

Think about it if the ANC was going to get two thirds majority anyway, then why even bother spending R200m on the campaign? if im not mistaken the most any party in south africa has ever spent?

All its about is showing you that we have access to huge amounts of money and we will direct it straight to the poor in other words we have the biggest dick in africa.

If the DA spent R800m in this elections they would of won. money talks and people are desperate for houses here. you show people you can get your hands on that kind of money people will follow and you can forget about trying to play the liberation struggle, poor is poor people are having there own liberation struggle everyday and if your hungry you go to the party with the bling. 

lol i must admit you guys have become americanized</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Osborne  // Apr 24, 2009 at 2:41 pm  </p>
<p>fair enough but before we end up hi jacking this thread. yes i agree 300 000 ground troops were needed thats why the bush administration tried to get countries involved it wasnt just a war between the US and terrorism its a global problem and im afraid the world powers didnt come to the party. so part of the blame for the lack of success is really the other countries lack of support  and not helping out and they based it on personnalities im afriad. </p>
<p>but back to south africa I strongly believe politics is all about who has access to a magical vault that has an endless supply of cash.</p>
<p>Think about it if the ANC was going to get two thirds majority anyway, then why even bother spending R200m on the campaign? if im not mistaken the most any party in south africa has ever spent?</p>
<p>All its about is showing you that we have access to huge amounts of money and we will direct it straight to the poor in other words we have the biggest dick in africa.</p>
<p>If the DA spent R800m in this elections they would of won. money talks and people are desperate for houses here. you show people you can get your hands on that kind of money people will follow and you can forget about trying to play the liberation struggle, poor is poor people are having there own liberation struggle everyday and if your hungry you go to the party with the bling. </p>
<p>lol i must admit you guys have become americanized</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Osborne</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-13833</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-13833</guid>
		<description>Chris, note that I said  that people were stupid to vote for somone who &quot;bungled&quot; the war.  I think the one good thing Bush did do was to invade Iraq in the fisrt place.  He bungled the implementation by embracing the Rumsfeld doctrine -- the assumption that air power and special forces, unaccompanied by a massive troop presence, could win. There should have been 300,000 boots on the ground back in 2003.  In effect the surge -- which McCain pushed, against resistance from the Bushists -- came five years too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, note that I said  that people were stupid to vote for somone who &#8220;bungled&#8221; the war.  I think the one good thing Bush did do was to invade Iraq in the fisrt place.  He bungled the implementation by embracing the Rumsfeld doctrine &#8212; the assumption that air power and special forces, unaccompanied by a massive troop presence, could win. There should have been 300,000 boots on the ground back in 2003.  In effect the surge &#8212; which McCain pushed, against resistance from the Bushists &#8212; came five years too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: khosi</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-13832</link>
		<dc:creator>khosi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-13832</guid>
		<description>Sne  // Apr 24, 2009 at 1:27 pm  

LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sne  // Apr 24, 2009 at 1:27 pm  </p>
<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Mcdaniel</title>
		<link>http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/on-a-two-thirds-majority-and-changing-the-constitution/#comment-13830</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Mcdaniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://constitutionallyspeaking.co.za/?p=985#comment-13830</guid>
		<description>Michael Osborne // Apr 24, 2009 at 1:41 pm 

I disagree with all your points i was one of them who voted for george bush so be a bit careful. the guy stood up to something were the rest of world didnt. so for that he has my respect but yes there were some bad policies no administration is perfect its all about tweeking them.

secondly its about money and its an african thing as well. If you have MIllions close to billions on elections you can buy your way to the presidency. The poor will see one thing and one thing only a party or an administration who has access to this kind of money and promise of delevery you cant bet that.

have a look here 
www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.php

You have money people listen doesnt matter if your black or white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Osborne // Apr 24, 2009 at 1:41 pm </p>
<p>I disagree with all your points i was one of them who voted for george bush so be a bit careful. the guy stood up to something were the rest of world didnt. so for that he has my respect but yes there were some bad policies no administration is perfect its all about tweeking them.</p>
<p>secondly its about money and its an african thing as well. If you have MIllions close to billions on elections you can buy your way to the presidency. The poor will see one thing and one thing only a party or an administration who has access to this kind of money and promise of delevery you cant bet that.</p>
<p>have a look here<br />
<a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/index.php</a></p>
<p>You have money people listen doesnt matter if your black or white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

