Quote of the week

The judgments are replete with the findings of dishonesty and mala fides against Major General Ntlemeza. These were judicial pronouncements. They therefore constitute direct evidence that Major General Ntlemeza lacks the requisite honesty, integrity and conscientiousness to occupy the position of any public office, not to mention an office as more important as that of the National Head of the DPCI, where independence, honesty and integrity are paramount to qualities. Currently no appeal lies against the findings of dishonesty and impropriety made by the Court in the judgments. Accordingly, such serious findings of fact in relation to Major General Ntlemeza, which go directly to Major General Ntlemeza’s trustworthiness, his honesty and integrity, are definitive. Until such findings are appealed against successfully they shall remain as a lapidary against Lieutenant General Ntlemeza.

Mabuse J
Helen Suzman Foundation and Another v Minister of Police and Others
7 February 2016

All the court papers in EFF & DA Nkandla application to the Con Court

Here are the papers submitted to the Constitutional Court in the two cases relating to the implementation of the Public Protector’s Nkandla Report.

DA case – Public Protector’s papers: DA 4th Resp Heads

DA case – Minister of Police’s Papers: DA 3rd Resp Heads

DA case – President Zuma’s papers: DA 2nd Resp Heads

DA case – Speaker’s papers: DA 1st Resp Heads

DA case – DA’s papers:DA App Heads

EFF case – Public Protector’s papers: EFF 3rd Resp Heads

EFF case – President Zuma’s papers: EFF 2nd Resp Heads

EFF case – Speaker’s papers: EFF 1st Resp Heads

EFF case – EFF’s papersEFF App Heads

SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest