Quote of the week

The judgments are replete with the findings of dishonesty and mala fides against Major General Ntlemeza. These were judicial pronouncements. They therefore constitute direct evidence that Major General Ntlemeza lacks the requisite honesty, integrity and conscientiousness to occupy the position of any public office, not to mention an office as more important as that of the National Head of the DPCI, where independence, honesty and integrity are paramount to qualities. Currently no appeal lies against the findings of dishonesty and impropriety made by the Court in the judgments. Accordingly, such serious findings of fact in relation to Major General Ntlemeza, which go directly to Major General Ntlemeza’s trustworthiness, his honesty and integrity, are definitive. Until such findings are appealed against successfully they shall remain as a lapidary against Lieutenant General Ntlemeza.

Mabuse J
Helen Suzman Foundation and Another v Minister of Police and Others
20 January 2012

SANDU media statment about deployment of soldiers

MEDIA STATEMENT BY THE SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL DEFENCE FORCE UNION (SANDU) IN REACTION TO THE CONCERNS OF POSSIBLE UNLAWFULNESS OF RECENT DEPLOYMENT OF SANDF MEMBERS IN CIVILIAN AREA’S
Friday 20 January 2012, SANDU Head Office, Pretoria:

SANDU has noted recent concerns expressed by legal experts in the media on the deployment of soldiers in civilian areas and the possible unlawfulness thereof.

The explanation provided by the Department of Defence which sought to justify the legality of these deployments based on a decade old open ended proclamation, by a president not even currently in office, begs belief. This dubious explanation only serves to strengthen the concerns already raised.

The last thing that is needed is that the South African public get the notion that soldiers deployed in civilian areas, to do what is essentially police work, is an acceptable norm and way of governance or that soldiers are deployable without stringent regard for constitutional imperatives.  SANDU has consulted its legal team on this issue and is convinced that the current deployments, if based on the reasons offered by the Department, are in all probability authorized in contravention of the Constitution and thus unlawful.

It is not SANDU’s place to direct , criticize or opine on operations conducted by the SANDF per se. The only concern it has as a Military Trade Union is that soldiers, if indeed unlawfully deployed, are at risk of attracting legal liability which they would normally escape were the deployments lawful. It is further of general concern that apparently disregard for the Constitution is considered acceptable in certain circumstances. This goes against the very substance of SANDU as an organization which has always fought for the constitutional rights of its members.

In view of the above facts SANDU has decided to urgently submit a complaint to the office of the Public Protector in order to have a pronouncement made on the legality of the deployments on the basis offered by the Department itself.

(JG GREEFF)

 NATIONAL SECRETARY: SANDU

 Enquiries: 082 573 0082

SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest