Mr Zuma is no ordinary litigant. He is the former President of the Republic, who remains a public figure and continues to wield significant political influence, while acting as an example to his supporters… He has a great deal of power to incite others to similarly defy court orders because his actions and any consequences, or lack thereof, are being closely observed by the public. If his conduct is met with impunity, he will do significant damage to the rule of law. As this Court noted in Mamabolo, “[n]o one familiar with our history can be unaware of the very special need to preserve the integrity of the rule of law”. Mr Zuma is subject to the laws of the Republic. No person enjoys exclusion or exemption from the sovereignty of our laws… It would be antithetical to the value of accountability if those who once held high office are not bound by the law.
Queer Gardens
Distrubing heteronormativity
A response to Prof Asmal’s view on the reparations case Jaco Barnard-Naudé Prof Kader Asmal’s erudite opinion (avaliable here) on why the […]
Angry appeals show true colours of business Published in Business Day on 13 January 2009 JACO BARNARD-NAUDÉ THE apartheid reparation […]
South African courts are likely to hand down several politically significant judgments in 2020. This will include cases involving Public […]
By Jaco Barnard-Naudé The controversy sparked by attorney Richard Spoor’s recent remarks which boils down to ‘I basically only brief […]
Statement by the Faculty of Law on the use of violence by SAPS 23 October 2015 The Faculty of Law […]
I arrived back yesterday after almost three weeks in Eastern Europe, where I remained blissfully unaware of the media-reported (and […]
I am flying off to Eastern Europe this afternoon and will only be back on 4 July. I am embarking […]
The Consulate General of the Federal Republic of Germany would like to draw the attention of the Cape Town legal […]