Quote of the week

Regard must be had to the higher standard of conduct expected from public officials, and the number of falsehoods that have been put forward by the Public Protector in the course of the litigation.  This conduct included the numerous “misstatements”, like misrepresenting, under oath, her reliance on evidence of economic experts in drawing up the report, failing to provide a complete record, ordered and indexed, so that the contents thereof could be determined, failing to disclose material meetings and then obfuscating the reasons for them and the reasons why they had not been previously disclosed, and generally failing to provide the court with a frank and candid account of her conduct in preparing the report. The punitive aspect of the costs order therefore stands.

Public Protector v South African Reserve Bank (CCT107/18) [2019] ZACC 29 (22 July 2019)
1 June 2012

ANC complaint to Public Protector about Western Cape tender


The ANC in the Western Cape requests you to investigate the Department of the Premier, the role of the premier (directly or indirectly through her discressionary appointed advisers / staff in her personal office) and the involvement of all other officials of the Provincial Government, together with two companies in the unauthorized appointment of one called Yardstick without following prior due process, no clear terms of reference or procurement approval process and the after the fact expansion of tender FMA 0027 to TBWA\ Hunt Lascaris and all other matters pertaining to this multimillion Rand contract. This process stretches from year 2010 to 2011.

We believe that the process undertook by the Provincial Government was flawed every step of the way and in breach of various regulations and other control measures, including, but not restricted to:

  • This flawed original tender process for the Department of The Premier was cancelled and started three times over, thus resulting in fruitless and wasteful expenditure. That the department’s line-function/top management was both player and referee without regard for good governance.
  • The extension of the contract by directing departments to appoint the same company without any public process and expanding the contract to include all media and communication activities across the government departments without involving treasury from the start as is required;
  • Advancing a further massive and new contract without due procurement process;
  • The involvement of a special advisor in the office of the premier or any other such officials in operational processes and adjudication against the Public Service Act prohibiting interference in the administration and management of the department(s) and also the continued presence of an official against the Supply Chain Management and Legal Services warning about conflict of interest;
  • Repeatedly ignoring cautionary advice from the Provincial Treasury and Supply Chain Management Unit.
  • By in general waste time and taxpayers money through inadequate demand planning procedures, lack of knowledge and competencies to see the process to fruition.
  • That the bid (on which the contract has been concluded) did not allude to a transversal contract and the need for single branding was not identified prior to the tender process. The process for a transversal tender was not facilitated by treasury as per regulation.
  • That contradictory declarations by the winning bidder was not verified.
  • That the scoring system is suspiciously riddled with anomalies and that most of the panel members ignored scoring instructions which resulted in unclear determination of acceptability.
  • That the shortlisting process is flawed as no documented record exists of how the two companies were arrived at.
  • That the contract was expanded without any cognizance of any provincial impact or considering current contracts of departments.
  • That the overall process has deficiencies / gaps and that a lack of control measures and good governance principles were exposed.
  • That a number of after the fact measures were taken in an attempt to cover over some of the deficiencies.
  • That many of the deviations and non-compliance issues may indicate possible corrupt activities.

These and others problems pointed out (also mentioned in a Provincial Treasury evaluation) require your office to immediately pay attention to the Provincial Government of the Western Cape as these are substantively serious.

If needed, we are available to expand on our request for an urgent investigation into this abuse of power, maladministration, improper dealings with respect to public money and random decisions taken by this government.

With kind regards,

Songezo Mjongile

Provincial Secretary

2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest