Quote of the week

Regard must be had to the higher standard of conduct expected from public officials, and the number of falsehoods that have been put forward by the Public Protector in the course of the litigation.  This conduct included the numerous “misstatements”, like misrepresenting, under oath, her reliance on evidence of economic experts in drawing up the report, failing to provide a complete record, ordered and indexed, so that the contents thereof could be determined, failing to disclose material meetings and then obfuscating the reasons for them and the reasons why they had not been previously disclosed, and generally failing to provide the court with a frank and candid account of her conduct in preparing the report. The punitive aspect of the costs order therefore stands.

KHAMPEPE J and THERON J
Public Protector v South African Reserve Bank (CCT107/18) [2019] ZACC 29 (22 July 2019)
14 May 2007

Assault on the Constitution

My criticism of the Constitutional Court judgment in the so called male rape case here and here has now been eloquently augmented by my friend Jaco Barnard. Dr Barnard also takes issue with the nonsensical reasoning of the Court and argues that the judgment represents an assault on the spirit of our Constitution. Read his article in today’s Business Day.
SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest