Quote of the week

Mr Zuma is no ordinary litigant. He is the former President of the Republic, who remains a public figure and continues to wield significant political influence, while acting as an example to his supporters… He has a great deal of power to incite others to similarly defy court orders because his actions and any consequences, or lack thereof, are being closely observed by the public. If his conduct is met with impunity, he will do significant damage to the rule of law. As this Court noted in Mamabolo, “[n]o one familiar with our history can be unaware of the very special need to preserve the integrity of the rule of law”. Mr Zuma is subject to the laws of the Republic. No person enjoys exclusion or exemption from the sovereignty of our laws… It would be antithetical to the value of accountability if those who once held high office are not bound by the law.

Khampepe j
Secretary of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, Corruption and Fraud in the Public Sector including Organs of State v Zuma and Others (CCT 52/21) [2021] ZACC 18
27 April 2007

Curiouser and curiouser

The story of the ANC and the hoax emails just get curiouser and curiouser. According to the Mail & Guardian the ANC task team asked to investigate the matter, found that the emails were genuine in the sense that they “existed in cyberspace” – they were written and sent by individuals – and were not fabricated by NIA officials.

Now former National Intelligence Agency boss Billy Masetlha has subpoenaed ANC secretary general Kgalema Motlanthe to hand over the ruling party’s “hoax” email report.

Masetlha’s motive in summonsing Motlanthe is straightforward: he is accused of being central to the fabrication of the emails, while the report finds that other, as yet unnamed, actors are responsible. If the document goes public, the authenticity of the messages would have to be further investigated.

What I do not understand is how anyone in his or her right mind could ever have thought that the content of the emails were genuine. When the Mail & Guardian published extracts from the emails, it became clear that they were obviously false. Yet people like Kgalema Motlanthe actually seem to have believed in their authenticity.

It seems to suggest that the ANC is so riddled with infighting and some of its leaders so paranoid that they would believe in the authenticity of such crude fabrications. It is embarrassing that Motlanthe, whose name is mentioned as a compromise candidate for the ANC Presidency, could have fallen for them.

Or was he set up by pro-Mbeki people to discredit him and eliminate him from the racefor the President of the ANC? Maybe he was handed the emails and someone very influential and important whispered in his ear that the emails were genuine exactly to set him up. But even if that is the case, the fact that he could have beleived in the authenticity of the emails probably makes him too paranoid and/or stupid to become President of South Africa.

SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest