Quote of the week

Regard must be had to the higher standard of conduct expected from public officials, and the number of falsehoods that have been put forward by the Public Protector in the course of the litigation.  This conduct included the numerous “misstatements”, like misrepresenting, under oath, her reliance on evidence of economic experts in drawing up the report, failing to provide a complete record, ordered and indexed, so that the contents thereof could be determined, failing to disclose material meetings and then obfuscating the reasons for them and the reasons why they had not been previously disclosed, and generally failing to provide the court with a frank and candid account of her conduct in preparing the report. The punitive aspect of the costs order therefore stands.

KHAMPEPE J and THERON J
Public Protector v South African Reserve Bank (CCT107/18) [2019] ZACC 29 (22 July 2019)
12 May 2015

DA v Speaker – judgment on removal and arrest of MPs:

Here is the Western Cape High Court judgment declaring invalid section 11 of the Powers, Privileges and Immunities of Parliament and Provincial Legislatures Act (dealing with the removal and arrest of MPs in Parliament). Click here: DA v Speaker

SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest