As seductive as certain perspectives of international law may appear to those who disagree with the outcome of the interpretative exercise conducted by this Court in the contempt judgment, sight must not be lost of the proper place of international law, especially in respect of an application for rescission. The approach that my Brother adopts may be apposite in the context of an appeal, where a court is enjoined to consider whether the court a quo erred in its interpretation of the law. Although it should be clear by now, I shall repeat it once more: this is not an appeal, for this Court’s orders are not appealable. I am deeply concerned that seeking to rely on articles of the ICCPR as a basis for rescission constitutes nothing more than sophistry.
The news that the previous head of the Department of Correctional Services, Linda Mti, has been appointed head of World Cup security is not surprising.
It seems part of a larger pattern that has emerged over the last year or two of the powerful acting like the high and mighty they think themselves to be.
Although Mti has not been convicted of anything, a dark cloud hangs over his head. Mti was arrested on drunken driving charges last year (a charge that was dropped, for the time being, because of delays in concluding blood tests). More troubling, an investigation by the Public Services Commission into serious allegations of conflict of interests was dropped because of his resignation late last year.
Maybe he is a nice guy who has never benefited from contracts awarded by his department and maybe he was not fall down drunk when he was stopped by officers late last year but was merely suffering from acute vertigo. Maybe he will do an excellent job as security chief.
All this should not matter to people who believe their only job is to make a success of the Soccer World Cup. They may argue that Mr. Mti is innocent until proven guilty or that racism informs the criticism of Mti, but they cannot deny that a whiff of scandal has enveloped the ex Commissioner.
People who really care about the success of the World Cup would not have appointed him because they would have wanted to avoid controversy – even if they believed that Mr was unfairly tainted. This is what happens when people feel accountable to the larger public (in
But some newly powerful individuals in
The newspapers will shout and scream and the 702 and
But in the long run this kind of attitude threatens to sabotage the chances of poor people to make a better life for themselves. If people in power do not care what others say they will act more and more arrogantly and will be less and less accountable, which means they will inevitably begin to beleive only themselves and will make monumental blunders.
So while such people think they are sending a big “up yours” to all those hoity-toity, namby-pamby, rich, mostly white, formerly baby-eating, whiners, the big “up yours” they are really sending is to the poor and marginalized in our society. How short-sighted can one be.BACK TO TOP