Quote of the week

As seductive as certain perspectives of international law may appear to those who disagree with the outcome of the interpretative exercise conducted by this Court in the contempt judgment, sight must not be lost of the proper place of international law, especially in respect of an application for rescission. The approach that my Brother adopts may be apposite in the context of an appeal, where a court is enjoined to consider whether the court a quo erred in its interpretation of the law. Although it should be clear by now, I shall repeat it once more: this is not an appeal, for this Court’s orders are not appealable. I am deeply concerned that seeking to rely on articles of the ICCPR as a basis for rescission constitutes nothing more than sophistry.

Khampepe J
Zuma v Secretary of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, Corruption and Fraud in the Public Sector Including Organs of State and Others (CCT 52/21) [2021] ZACC 28 (17 September 2021)
16 March 2012

Office of Chief Justice Media statement on “Leadership Conference”

MEDIA STATEMENT ON THE HEADS OF COURTS

RE: THE I CAN LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE

16 MARCH 2012

Following media coverage on the notice sent to the Heads of Courts relating to a leadership conference; it has become necessary to put the matter in its correct perspective.

As indicated previously, the need for Heads of Courts to be offered leadership training was identified as far back as 2005. As a matter of record from the 4th to the 5th June 2006, Judges underwent leadership training under the auspices of the Stephen Covey Foundation. In July 2011, the Access to Justice Conference passed a resolution that leadership training be offered to Heads of Courts. This resolution was further endorsed by the Heads of Courts themselves at one of their regular meetings.

It is in this context that the invitation to the Heads of Courts to attend the John Maxwell l CAN Leadership conference or workshop must be understood. In this regard; at a meeting of the Heads of Courts in Johannesburg today (Friday, 16 March 2012); the Heads of Courts comprising the Chief Justice, the Deputy President of the Supreme Court of Appeal, the Judges President of the various Divisions of the High Court and Specialist Courts – the Heads of Courts present unanimously stated that they had not felt compelled to attend the conference. They further distanced themselves from suggestions that they were ordered to attend the I CAN Leadership conference; saying that they did not understand the correspondence to be ordering them to attend.

It became clear during the meeting, that the Heads of Courts had also understood the communication to be presenting them with an opportunity to enhance and strengthen their leadership capacity. The Chief Justice further commits himself to the principles and values enshrined in the Constitution and therefore would not engage in any activity that would undermine those values.

Ends.

Enquiries: Lulama Luti; Director: Media Relations, Office of the Chief Justice Tel: +27 (0) 11 359 7537 / 7570; Cell: +27 (0) 76 424 0667; Email: luti@concourt.org.za

SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest