Quote of the week

As seductive as certain perspectives of international law may appear to those who disagree with the outcome of the interpretative exercise conducted by this Court in the contempt judgment, sight must not be lost of the proper place of international law, especially in respect of an application for rescission. The approach that my Brother adopts may be apposite in the context of an appeal, where a court is enjoined to consider whether the court a quo erred in its interpretation of the law. Although it should be clear by now, I shall repeat it once more: this is not an appeal, for this Court’s orders are not appealable. I am deeply concerned that seeking to rely on articles of the ICCPR as a basis for rescission constitutes nothing more than sophistry.

Khampepe J
Zuma v Secretary of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, Corruption and Fraud in the Public Sector Including Organs of State and Others (CCT 52/21) [2021] ZACC 28 (17 September 2021)
8 October 2009

Public Lecture by Justice Yvonne Mokgoro on 13 October 2009

Prof Gerhard Lubbe, Dean of the Faculty of Law and

Prof Sandra Liebenberg, H.F. Oppenheimer Chair in Human Rights Law,  University of Stellenbosch cordially invite you to a public lecture presented by:

Justice Yvonne Mokgoro

Ubuntu, the Constitution and the Rights of Non-Citizens

Date & Time: Tuesday, 13 October 2009 at 6:30pm

Venue: J.C. de Wet Hall,  Old Main Building,

c/o Ryneveld and Victoria Street, Stellenbosch

Parking will be available in the Faculty parking lot

(entrance Victoria Street)

Refreshments will be served afterwards

SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest