Quote of the week

Regard must be had to the higher standard of conduct expected from public officials, and the number of falsehoods that have been put forward by the Public Protector in the course of the litigation.  This conduct included the numerous “misstatements”, like misrepresenting, under oath, her reliance on evidence of economic experts in drawing up the report, failing to provide a complete record, ordered and indexed, so that the contents thereof could be determined, failing to disclose material meetings and then obfuscating the reasons for them and the reasons why they had not been previously disclosed, and generally failing to provide the court with a frank and candid account of her conduct in preparing the report. The punitive aspect of the costs order therefore stands.

KHAMPEPE J and THERON J
Public Protector v South African Reserve Bank (CCT107/18) [2019] ZACC 29 (22 July 2019)
13 October 2015

Available papers in Constitutional Court Nkandla challenges from EFF and DA

EFF heads of argument FINAL

Notice of Motion EFF v Speaker and Another img-806083234

President Jacob Zuma’s Affidavit ANS.AFF.EFF.JZ-STATE.ATTORNEY(170915)_final[1]

Leave granted for PP to intervene Order – CCT 143 Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Asse…[3]

Directions – CCT 143-15 The Economic Freedom Fighters v The Speaker of the National Assembly and Another

Set Down Directions CCT 171-15 Democratic Alliance v Speaker of the Nati…[2]

NoM Nkandla (6 August 2015)

Public Protector- Founding Affidavit intervention application (final) (GM settled)- 26.09.2015

EFF v Speaker Another – Notice of Motion- intervention application (FINAL)

150908 – DA vs Speaker NOM (CC)_FINAL

15 09 08 – DA vs Speaker_Selfe FA_CC_FINAL EJ

SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest