Quote of the week

[E]ven if the [coronavirus] is under control, many voters may be cautious about stepping out to a polling place where many people will gather. When I reached out to a wide array of voting rights advocates, election law scholars, and former election officials, I heard the same three-word solution over and over again: “vote by mail.” Mail-in ballots are a major reason turnout did not crater in the Florida and Arizona primary elections held earlier this month. And they are the most straightforward way to ensure that voters can still cast a ballot even if they are stuck at home. In the ideal regime, which already exists in Colorado, Oregon, Washington, Utah, and Hawaii, voters would automatically receive a ballot in the mail in the weeks before the election. These voters should also be given the option to vote in person, in case they do not receive the ballot or lose it, but no one should have to request a mail-in ballot in order to receive one.

Ian Millhiser
Vox
13 October 2015

Available papers in Constitutional Court Nkandla challenges from EFF and DA

EFF heads of argument FINAL

Notice of Motion EFF v Speaker and Another img-806083234

President Jacob Zuma’s Affidavit ANS.AFF.EFF.JZ-STATE.ATTORNEY(170915)_final[1]

Leave granted for PP to intervene Order – CCT 143 Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Asse…[3]

Directions – CCT 143-15 The Economic Freedom Fighters v The Speaker of the National Assembly and Another

Set Down Directions CCT 171-15 Democratic Alliance v Speaker of the Nati…[2]

NoM Nkandla (6 August 2015)

Public Protector- Founding Affidavit intervention application (final) (GM settled)- 26.09.2015

EFF v Speaker Another – Notice of Motion- intervention application (FINAL)

150908 – DA vs Speaker NOM (CC)_FINAL

15 09 08 – DA vs Speaker_Selfe FA_CC_FINAL EJ

SHARE:     
BACK TO TOP
2015 Constitutionally Speaking | website created by Idea in a Forest